This Stage used 3 Reward Models

DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese synthetic intelligence company that develops open-source big language models (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and moneyed by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, developed the business in 2023 and acts as its CEO.

The DeepSeek-R1 design supplies reactions similar to other contemporary big language models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a significantly lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and requires a tenth of the computing power of an equivalent LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI designs were established in the middle of United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were intended to the ability of these 2 nations to establish innovative AI systems. [6] [7]

On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek released its first free chatbot app, based upon the DeepSeek-R1 model, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had surpassed ChatGPT as the most-downloaded complimentary app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] causing Nvidia’s share cost to visit 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success versus bigger and more recognized competitors has been explained as “upending AI“, [8] making up “the very first chance at what is becoming a worldwide AI area race”, [11] and introducing “a brand-new age of AI brinkmanship”. [12]

DeepSeek makes its generative artificial intelligence algorithms, designs, and training details open-source, allowing its code to be easily offered for use, modification, watching, and designing documents for developing functions. [13] The business supposedly strongly hires young AI scientists from leading Chinese universities, [8] and employs from outside the computer technology field to diversify its models’ knowledge and abilities. [3]

In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI lover Liang Wenfeng, who had been trading since the 2007-2008 monetary crisis while attending Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he developed High-Flyer as a hedge fund focused on establishing and using AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer exclusively used AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has made its generative synthetic intelligence chatbot open source, indicating its code is easily available for usage, adjustment, and viewing. This consists of authorization to gain access to and utilize the source code, as well as style documents, for building purposes. [13]

According to 36Kr, Liang had actually developed a shop of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are utilized to train AI [16], before the United States federal government imposed AI chip restrictions on China. [15]

In April 2023, High-Flyer started a synthetic general intelligence laboratory committed to research developing AI tools different from High-Flyer’s financial service. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the financiers, the laboratory became its own company, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Venture capital companies hesitated in offering funding as it was unlikely that it would have the ability to produce an exit in a short duration of time. [15]

After releasing DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which used strong performance for a low rate, DeepSeek became known as the catalyst for China’s AI model rate war. It was quickly dubbed the “Pinduoduo of AI”, and other major tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba started to cut the rate of their AI models to take on the company. Despite the low cost charged by DeepSeek, it paid compared to its rivals that were losing cash. [20]

DeepSeek is concentrated on research study and has no in-depth plans for commercialization; [20] this also allows its innovation to prevent the most stringent arrangements of China’s AI regulations, such as needing consumer-facing innovation to abide by the federal government’s controls on information. [3]

DeepSeek’s working with preferences target technical abilities instead of work experience, resulting in many brand-new hires being either recent university graduates or developers whose AI professions are less established. [18] [3] Likewise, the company hires individuals without any computer technology background to help its innovation comprehend other topics and understanding locations, including having the ability to produce poetry and perform well on the notoriously tough Chinese college admissions exams (Gaokao). [3]

Development and release history

DeepSeek LLM

On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek launched its first series of model, DeepSeek-Coder, which is offered free of charge to both researchers and business users. The code for the design was made open-source under the MIT license, with an additional license arrangement (“DeepSeek license”) regarding “open and responsible downstream usage” for the design itself. [21]

They are of the same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed listed below. The series includes 8 models, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]

1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base designs.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of guideline information. This produced the Instruct designs.

They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, connected by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]

On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek released the DeepSeek-LLM series of models, with 7B and 67B specifications in both Base and Chat forms (no Instruct was launched). It was established to contend with other LLMs offered at the time. The paper declared benchmark outcomes greater than most open source LLMs at the time, specifically Llama 2. [26]: area 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the design was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the design itself. [27]

The architecture was basically the exact same as those of the Llama series. They utilized the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text gotten by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]

The Chat versions of the two Base designs was likewise launched simultaneously, obtained by training Base by monitored finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]

On 9 January 2024, they released 2 DeepSeek-MoE models (Base, Chat), each of 16B specifications (2.7 B triggered per token, 4K context length). The training was essentially the very same as DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They declared similar performance with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a version of the basic sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared experts” that are always queried, and “routed experts” that might not be. They discovered this to assist with skilled balancing. In standard MoE, some professionals can end up being overly counted on, while other professionals may be rarely used, wasting specifications. Attempting to balance the experts so that they are similarly used then triggers professionals to reproduce the exact same capability. They proposed the shared professionals to learn core capacities that are frequently used, and let the routed specialists to discover the peripheral capabilities that are hardly ever used. [28]

In April 2024, they released 3 DeepSeek-Math models specialized for doing mathematics: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]

1. Initialize with a previously pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base model.
3. Train an instruction-following model by SFT Base with 776K math issues and their tool-use-integrated detailed services. This produced the Instruct design.
Reinforcement knowing (RL): The reward model was a process reward model (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd approach. [30] This benefit model was then used to train Instruct utilizing group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K mathematics concerns “related to GSM8K and MATH”. The reward design was constantly updated throughout training to prevent reward hacking. This resulted in the RL model.

V2

In May 2024, they released the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series includes 4 models, 2 base models (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The two bigger models were trained as follows: [31]

1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K utilizing YaRN. [32] This led to DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M circumstances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for security. This led to DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not launched.
4. RL using GRPO in 2 stages. The very first stage was trained to solve mathematics and coding problems. This stage used 1 reward design, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for math). The 2nd stage was trained to be handy, safe, and follow rules. This stage used 3 benefit models. The helpfulness and safety reward designs were trained on human preference information. The rule-based reward model was by hand programmed. All skilled reward designs were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This resulted in the released variation of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.

They selected 2-staged RL, since they found that RL on reasoning information had “special attributes” various from RL on basic data. For example, RL on thinking could enhance over more training actions. [31]

The two V2-Lite designs were smaller sized, and experienced similarly, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat only underwent SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite version to help “more research and advancement on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]

Architecturally, the V2 designs were considerably modified from the DeepSeek LLM series. They changed the standard attention system by a low-rank approximation called multi-head latent attention (MLA), and used the mixture of specialists (MoE) variant previously released in January. [28]

The Financial Times reported that it was more affordable than its peers with a rate of 2 RMB for each million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]

In June 2024, they released 4 designs in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]

1. The Base models were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the variation at the end of pretraining), then pretrained further for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base designs.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were utilized to generate 20K code-related and 30K math-related guideline data, then integrated with a guideline dataset of 300M tokens. This was utilized for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The benefit for mathematics issues was computed by comparing to the ground-truth label. The reward for code problems was created by a benefit design trained to forecast whether a program would pass the unit tests.

DeepSeek-V2.5 was released in September and updated in December 2024. It was made by combining DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]

V3

In December 2024, they launched a base design DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat design DeepSeek-V3. The design architecture is basically the same as V2. They were trained as follows: [37]

1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, mostly English and Chinese. It contained a greater ratio of mathematics and programming than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length two times, from 4K to 32K and after that to 128K, utilizing YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 epochs on 1.5 M samples of reasoning (mathematics, programs, logic) and non-reasoning (creative writing, roleplay, simple question answering) information. Reasoning information was produced by “expert designs”. Non-reasoning information was created by DeepSeek-V2.5 and inspected by people. – The “expert designs” were trained by starting with an unspecified base design, then SFT on both data, and artificial information generated by an internal DeepSeek-R1 model. The system timely asked the R1 to show and confirm during thinking. Then the expert designs were RL utilizing an undefined reward function.
– Each expert design was trained to generate simply artificial thinking data in one particular domain (mathematics, programming, reasoning).
– Expert models were used, instead of R1 itself, since the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, poor formatting, and excessive length”.

4. Model-based benefit models were made by beginning with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human choice information consisting of both final benefit and chain-of-thought causing the last reward. The reward model produced benefit signals for both questions with objective but free-form answers, and questions without objective responses (such as innovative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO utilizing both benefit models and rule-based reward. The rule-based benefit was computed for math issues with a last answer (put in a box), and for programs issues by unit tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.

The DeepSeek group performed extensive low-level engineering to attain performance. They utilized mixed-precision arithmetic. Much of the forward pass was performed in 8-bit drifting point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) instead of the standard 32-bit, needing special GEMM regimens to collect accurately. They utilized a custom-made 12-bit float (E5M6) for only the inputs to the linear layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states were in 16-bit (BF16). They lessened the communication latency by overlapping thoroughly computation and interaction, such as devoting 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for only inter-GPU communication. They reduced interaction by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the exact machine each specialist was on in order to prevent specific makers being queried more frequently than the others, adding auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing techniques. [37]

After training, it was deployed on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are connected by NVLink, and the clusters are linked by InfiniBand. [37]

Benchmark tests show that DeepSeek-V3 exceeded Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]

R1

On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview became available by means of DeepSeek’s API, as well as by means of a chat user interface after visiting. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for sensible inference, mathematical thinking, and real-time analytical. DeepSeek declared that it went beyond performance of OpenAI o1 on criteria such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal specified when it used 15 issues from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 design reached a solution much faster than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]

On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek launched DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The company also launched some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” designs, which are not initialized on V3-Base, however instead are initialized from other pretrained open-weight models, consisting of LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on synthetic information created by R1. [47]

A conversation in between User and Assistant. The user asks a question, and the Assistant fixes it. The assistant first thinks of the reasoning process in the mind and after that provides the user with the answer. The reasoning process and response are enclosed within and tags, respectively, i.e., reasoning process here answer here. User:. Assistant:

DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained specifically using GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous variations, they utilized no model-based reward. All benefit functions were rule-based, “generally” of two types (other types were not defined): precision benefits and format rewards. Accuracy reward was inspecting whether a boxed response is right (for math) or whether a code passes tests (for shows). Format benefit was checking whether the model puts its thinking trace within … [47]

As R1-Zero has issues with readability and blending languages, R1 was trained to deal with these issues and further improve reasoning: [47]

1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” information all with the standard format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the very same RL process as R1-Zero, however likewise with a “language consistency benefit” to motivate it to react monolingually. This produced an internal model not launched.
3. Synthesize 600K thinking information from the internal design, with rejection tasting (i.e. if the generated reasoning had an incorrect final response, then it is eliminated). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning data (writing, factual QA, self-cognition, translation) using DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K synthetic data for 2 dates.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based reward (for reasoning jobs) and model-based reward (for non-reasoning tasks, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.

Distilled models were trained by SFT on 800K data manufactured from DeepSeek-R1, in a comparable method as action 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]

Assessment and reactions

DeepSeek released its AI Assistant, which uses the V3 design as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had surpassed ChatGPT as the highest-rated free app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot apparently responds to concerns, solves logic issues and composes computer system programs on par with other chatbots on the market, according to benchmark tests used by American AI companies. [3]

DeepSeek-V3 utilizes significantly fewer resources compared to its peers; for example, whereas the world’s leading AI companies train their chatbots with supercomputers using as numerous as 16,000 graphics processing units (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek declares to have needed just about 2,000 GPUs, specifically the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at a cost of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is roughly one tenth of what United States tech huge Meta invested constructing its most current AI technology. [3]

DeepSeek’s competitive efficiency at fairly very little cost has actually been acknowledged as potentially challenging the global supremacy of American AI designs. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, described the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik minute” for American AI. [49] [50] The performance of its R1 design was supposedly “on par with” among OpenAI’s newest models when used for jobs such as mathematics, coding, and natural language thinking; [51] echoing other analysts, American Silicon Valley endeavor capitalist Marc Andreessen also described R1 as “AI’s Sputnik minute”. [51]

DeepSeek’s creator, Liang Wenfeng has been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media extensively applauded DeepSeek as a nationwide property. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang welcomed Liang Wenfeng to his symposium with professionals and asked him to supply viewpoints and recommendations on a draft for comments of the annual 2024 government work report. [55]

DeepSeek’s optimization of minimal resources has highlighted potential limits of United States sanctions on China’s AI advancement, which consist of export limitations on advanced AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the business’s AI designs consequently “stimulated market turmoil” [57] and triggered shares in major global innovation companies to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of competing Broadcom. Other tech firms also sank, consisting of Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip equipment maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A worldwide selloff of technology stocks on Nasdaq, triggered by the release of the R1 design, had actually resulted in record losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and computer hardware business; [59] by 28 January 2025, a total of $1 trillion of worth was rubbed out American stocks. [50]

Leading figures in the American AI sector had combined reactions to DeepSeek’s success and efficiency. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose companies are associated with the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to develop American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “very excellent”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who announced The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a positive advancement. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, consisting of Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk revealed hesitation of the app’s performance or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various business, including Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are seeking to utilize the design in their program. [68]

On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek restricted its brand-new user registration to phone numbers from mainland China, email addresses, or Google account logins, following a “massive” cyberattack interfered with the proper functioning of its servers. [69] [70]

Some sources have actually observed that the official application programs interface (API) version of R1, which runs from servers located in China, utilizes censorship systems for subjects that are thought about politically sensitive for the federal government of China. For instance, the model refuses to address questions about the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, comparisons in between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI may initially produce an answer, but then deletes it soon afterwards and changes it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my present scope. Let’s speak about something else.” [72] The integrated censorship systems and constraints can just be gotten rid of to a minimal degree in the open-source version of the R1 model. If the “core socialist values” defined by the Chinese Internet regulative authorities are discussed, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, conversations are ended. [74] When checked by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 explained Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s area,” and stated: “We strongly oppose any form of ‘Taiwan self-reliance’ separatist activities and are devoted to attaining the total reunification of the motherland through serene means.” [75] In January 2025, Western scientists were able to fool DeepSeek into providing certain responses to a few of these subjects by asking for in its answer to swap certain letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]

Security and privacy

Some experts fear that the federal government of China might utilize the AI system for foreign impact operations, spreading disinformation, surveillance and the development of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s personal privacy terms and conditions say “We save the details we gather in safe and secure servers found in the People’s Republic of China … We may collect your text or audio input, timely, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other material that you offer to our model and Services”. Although the information storage and collection policy follows ChatGPT’s personal privacy policy, [79] a Wired post reports this as security issues. [80] In reaction, the Italian data security authority is seeking extra details on DeepSeek’s collection and use of personal information, and the United States National Security Council announced that it had begun a nationwide security evaluation. [81] [82] Taiwan’s federal government banned the use of DeepSeek at federal government ministries on security grounds and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened a query into DeepSeek’s use of individual information. [83]

Artificial intelligence market in China.

Notes

^ a b c The number of heads does not equivalent the number of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the design named DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was launched as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview needed choosing “Deep Think allowed”, and every user could utilize it only 50 times a day.
References

^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s inexpensive, open AI design DeepSeek delights researchers”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic reveals an AI world all set to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Taking On Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s more affordable models and weaker chips call into concern trillions in AI infrastructure costs”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports may hit India’s AI aspirations”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia investigation signals widening of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dismisses ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you ought to understand”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it triggering Nvidia and other stocks to drop?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares topple as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a top Chinese AI model got rid of US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the initial on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the original on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is changing how AI models are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI leader”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at primary · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, recovered 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at primary”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at primary”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at primary”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s brand-new AI model outshines Meta, OpenAI items”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, exceeds Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s brand-new AI design appears to be among the best ‘open’ challengers yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: unleashing supercharged thinking power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the original on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s very first thinking design R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 performance”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, but China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the original on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI start-up DeepSeek overtakes ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has reached its Sputnik moment”. The Hill. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik minute’: $1tn wiped off US stocks after Chinese firm unveils AI chatbot” – by means of The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI startup that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek poses a challenge to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock thrashing, Graphika says”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 ， 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI business’s AI design development highlights limits of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot triggers US market turmoil, wiping $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek stimulates global AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of worth”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ however Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella promotes DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “super remarkable”: “We must take the developments out of China extremely, very seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek design ‘remarkable'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson bashes China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek development “favorable””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – through NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman praises: What leaders say on DeepSeek’s disruption”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘questions’ DeepSeek’s claims, recommends massive Nvidia GPU infrastructure”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS clients, consisting of Stripe and Toyota, are hounding the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI designs”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek struck with ‘large-scale’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app stores”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek briefly restricted new sign-ups, pointing out ‘massive malicious attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has sparked a $1 trillion panic – and it doesn’t appreciate free speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship appears like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We attempted out DeepSeek. It worked well, till we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on a global AI race: geopolitics, development and the rise of chaos”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek jolts Silicon Valley, providing the AI race its ‘Sputnik moment'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI poses formidable cyber, information personal privacy dangers”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts advise caution over use of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has painted a substantial TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator looks for info from DeepSeek on information defense”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House examines impact of China AI app DeepSeek on nationwide security, authorities states”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.