Generative Expert System

Improvements in transformer-based deep neural networks, especially big language models (LLMs), made it possible for an AI boom of generative AI systems in the early 2020s. These consist of chatbots such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and LLaMA; text-to-image artificial intelligence image generation systems such as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, and DALL-E; and text-to-video AI generators such as Sora. [9] [10] [11] [12] Companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Baidu along with numerous smaller companies have established generative AI designs. [7] [13] [14]

Generative AI has uses across a vast array of industries, including software advancement, health care, financing, entertainment, customer support, [15] sales and marketing, [16] art, writing, [17] style, [18] and item design. [19] However, issues have actually been raised about the potential abuse of generative AI such as cybercrime, using phony news or deepfakes to deceive or manipulate people, and the mass replacement of human tasks. [20] [21] Copyright law concerns likewise exist around generative models that are trained on and replicate copyrighted artworks. [22]

Early history

Since its inception, researchers in the field have actually raised philosophical and ethical arguments about the nature of the human mind and the repercussions of creating artificial beings with human-like intelligence; these problems have actually previously been explored by myth, fiction and philosophy because antiquity. [23] The idea of automatic art dates back at least to the robot of ancient Greek civilization, where developers such as Daedalus and Hero of Alexandria were referred to as having actually developed machines capable of writing text, creating sounds, and playing music. [24] [25] The custom of imaginative automations has flourished throughout history, exemplified by Maillardet’s automaton developed in the early 1800s. [26] Markov chains have actually long been used to model natural languages given that their advancement by Russian mathematician Andrey Markov in the early 20th century. Markov released his very first paper on the subject in 1906, [27] [28] and examined the pattern of vowels and consonants in the unique Eugeny Onegin utilizing Markov chains. Once a Markov chain is learned on a text corpus, it can then be utilized as a probabilistic text generator. [29] [30]

Academic synthetic intelligence

The scholastic discipline of expert system was established at a research study workshop held at Dartmouth College in 1956 and has experienced several waves of advancement and optimism in the decades because. [31] Artificial Intelligence research study began in the 1950s with works like Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950) and the 1956 Dartmouth Summer Research Project on AI. Since the 1950s, artists and scientists have actually utilized artificial intelligence to develop artistic works. By the early 1970s, Harold Cohen was developing and showing generative AI works created by AARON, the computer program Cohen produced to produce paintings. [32]

The terms generative AI planning or generative planning were used in the 1980s and 1990s to refer to AI preparing systems, specifically computer-aided process planning, used to generate sequences of actions to reach a defined goal. [33] [34] Generative AI preparation systems utilized symbolic AI approaches such as state area search and restriction fulfillment and were a “reasonably fully grown” technology by the early 1990s. They were used to create crisis action prepare for military usage, [35] process prepare for making [33] and choice strategies such as in model autonomous spacecraft. [36]

Generative neural webs (2014-2019)

Since its creation, the field of artificial intelligence utilized both discriminative models and generative models, to design and anticipate data. Beginning in the late 2000s, the introduction of deep learning drove development and research study in image classification, speech recognition, natural language processing and other tasks. Neural networks in this period were usually trained as discriminative designs, due to the difficulty of generative modeling. [37]

In 2014, improvements such as the variational autoencoder and generative adversarial network produced the very first useful deep neural networks capable of finding out generative designs, rather than discriminative ones, for complicated information such as images. These deep generative models were the very first to output not only class labels for images but also whole images.

In 2017, the Transformer network made it possible for advancements in generative models compared to older Long-Short Term Memory models, [38] causing the first generative pre-trained transformer (GPT), called GPT-1, in 2018. [39] This was followed in 2019 by GPT-2 which demonstrated the ability to generalize without supervision to many different jobs as a Foundation model. [40]

The new generative models introduced during this duration permitted for big neural networks to be trained using not being watched learning or semi-supervised learning, instead of the monitored learning typical of discriminative designs. Unsupervised knowing got rid of the requirement for people to by hand label information, permitting bigger networks to be trained. [41]

Generative AI boom (2020-)

In March 2020, 15. ai, created by a confidential MIT researcher, was a free web application that might create persuading character voices utilizing very little training information. [42] The platform is credited as the first mainstream service to popularize AI voice cloning (audio deepfakes) in memes and content creation, influencing subsequent advancements in voice AI innovation. [43] [44]

In 2021, the emergence of DALL-E, a transformer-based pixel generative design, marked an advance in AI-generated imagery. [45] This was followed by the releases of Midjourney and Stable Diffusion in 2022, which further democratized access to premium expert system art production from natural language prompts. [46] These systems demonstrated unmatched abilities in generating photorealistic images, art work, and designs based upon text descriptions, resulting in extensive adoption among artists, designers, and the public.

In late 2022, the general public release of ChatGPT revolutionized the accessibility and application of generative AI for general-purpose text-based tasks. [47] The system’s capability to participate in natural conversations, create creative material, assist with coding, and carry out different analytical jobs caught worldwide attention and stimulated prevalent discussion about AI’s possible effect on work, education, and imagination. [48]

In March 2023, GPT-4’s release represented another jump in generative AI capabilities. A group from Microsoft Research controversially argued that it “could fairly be considered as an early (yet still incomplete) version of an artificial general intelligence (AGI) system.” [49] However, this assessment was objected to by other scholars who kept that generative AI remained “still far from reaching the benchmark of ‘general human intelligence'” since 2023. [50] Later in 2023, Meta launched ImageBind, an AI model combining multiple techniques consisting of text, images, video, thermal information, 3D information, audio, and motion, leading the way for more immersive generative AI applications. [51]

In December 2023, Google unveiled Gemini, a multimodal AI design readily available in four variations: Ultra, Pro, Flash, and Nano. [52] The business incorporated Gemini Pro into its Bard chatbot and revealed prepare for “Bard Advanced” powered by the bigger Gemini Ultra model. [53] In February 2024, Google combined Bard and Duet AI under the Gemini brand name, releasing a mobile app on Android and incorporating the service into the Google app on iOS. [54]

In March 2024, Anthropic launched the Claude 3 household of big language models, including Claude 3 Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus. [55] The models showed significant enhancements in capabilities throughout numerous benchmarks, with Claude 3 Opus especially outperforming leading designs from OpenAI and Google. [56] In June 2024, Anthropic released Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which showed enhanced efficiency compared to the larger Claude 3 Opus, especially in locations such as coding, multistep workflows, and image analysis. [57]

According to a survey by SAS and Coleman Parkes Research, China has become a global leader in generative AI adoption, with 83% of Chinese participants utilizing the innovation, going beyond both the international average of 54% and the U.S. rate of 65%. This management is additional evidenced by China’s intellectual home developments in the field, with a UN report revealing that Chinese entities filed over 38,000 generative AI patents from 2014 to 2023, substantially surpassing the United States in patent applications. [58]

Modalities

A generative AI system is constructed by applying not being watched artificial intelligence (invoking for circumstances neural network architectures such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), variation autoencoders (VAEs), transformers, or self-supervised device learning trained on a dataset. The abilities of a generative AI system depend upon the modality or kind of the data set utilized. Generative AI can be either unimodal or multimodal; unimodal systems take just one kind of input, whereas multimodal systems can take more than one type of input. [59] For instance, one version of OpenAI’s GPT-4 accepts both text and image inputs. [60]

Text

Generative AI systems trained on words or word tokens consist of GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-4o, LaMDA, LLaMA, BLOOM, Gemini and others (see List of big language models). They can natural language processing, maker translation, and natural language generation and can be used as structure designs for other tasks. [62] Data sets consist of BookCorpus, Wikipedia, and others (see List of text corpora).

Code

In addition to natural language text, large language designs can be trained on programming language text, enabling them to create source code for new computer programs. [63] Examples include OpenAI Codex and the VS Code fork Cursor. [64]

Images

Producing top quality visual art is a popular application of generative AI. [65] Generative AI systems trained on sets of images with text captions consist of Imagen, DALL-E, Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, FLUX.1, Stable Diffusion and others (see Artificial intelligence art, Generative art, and Synthetic media). They are commonly utilized for text-to-image generation and neural style transfer. [66] Datasets include LAION-5B and others (see List of datasets in computer vision and image processing).

Audio

Generative AI can likewise be trained thoroughly on audio clips to produce natural-sounding speech synthesis and text-to-speech capabilities. An early leader in this field was 15. ai, introduced in March 2020, which demonstrated the ability to clone character voices utilizing just 15 seconds of training information. [67] The website gained prevalent attention for its ability to generate emotionally meaningful speech for different imaginary characters, though it was later taken offline in 2022 due to copyright issues. [68] [69] [70] Commercial alternatives consequently emerged, including ElevenLabs’ context-aware synthesis tools and Meta Platform’s Voicebox. [71]

Generative AI systems such as MusicLM [72] and MusicGen [73] can also be trained on the audio waveforms of recorded music together with text annotations, in order to create brand-new musical samples based upon text descriptions such as a relaxing violin melody backed by a distorted guitar riff.

Music

Audio deepfakes of lyrics have actually been produced, like the song Savages, which utilized AI to imitate rapper Jay-Z’s vocals. Music artist’s instrumentals and lyrics are copyrighted but their voices aren’t protected from regenerative AI yet, raising an argument about whether artists must get royalties from audio deepfakes. [74]

Many AI music generators have actually been created that can be created utilizing a text expression, category alternatives, and looped libraries of bars and riffs. [75]

Video

Generative AI trained on annotated video can generate temporally-coherent, detailed and photorealistic video. Examples include Sora by OpenAI, [12] Gen-1 and Gen-2 by Runway, [76] and Make-A-Video by Meta Platforms. [77]

Actions

Generative AI can also be trained on the motions of a robotic system to produce new trajectories for movement preparation or navigation. For instance, UniPi from Google Research utilizes triggers like “get blue bowl” or “wipe plate with yellow sponge” to manage motions of a robot arm. [78] Multimodal “vision-language-action” designs such as Google’s RT-2 can perform rudimentary reasoning in response to user prompts and visual input, such as getting a toy dinosaur when offered the timely pick up the extinct animal at a table filled with toy animals and other items. [79]

3D modeling

Artificially intelligent computer-aided style (CAD) can utilize text-to-3D, image-to-3D, and video-to-3D to automate 3D modeling. [80] AI-based CAD libraries could also be established using connected open information of schematics and diagrams. [81] AI CAD assistants are utilized as tools to help streamline workflow. [82]

Software and hardware

Generative AI designs are utilized to power chatbot items such as ChatGPT, programming tools such as GitHub Copilot, [83] text-to-image items such as Midjourney, and text-to-video items such as Runway Gen-2. [84] Generative AI functions have actually been incorporated into a range of existing commercially available items such as Microsoft Office (Microsoft Copilot), [85] Google Photos, [86] and the Adobe Suite (Adobe Firefly). [87] Many generative AI designs are likewise available as open-source software application, including Stable Diffusion and the LLaMA [88] language model.

Smaller generative AI models with up to a few billion specifications can run on smart devices, ingrained devices, and desktop computers. For example, LLaMA-7B (a variation with 7 billion specifications) can operate on a Raspberry Pi 4 [89] and one version of Stable Diffusion can work on an iPhone 11. [90]

Larger models with tens of billions of specifications can work on laptop computer or desktop. To attain an acceptable speed, designs of this size might require accelerators such as the GPU chips produced by NVIDIA and AMD or the Neural Engine included in Apple silicon items. For instance, the 65 billion parameter variation of LLaMA can be configured to work on a desktop PC. [91]

The benefits of running generative AI in your area include protection of personal privacy and copyright, and avoidance of rate limiting and censorship. The subreddit r/LocalLLaMA in specific focuses on using consumer-grade gaming graphics cards [92] through such techniques as compression. That forum is among only 2 sources Andrej Karpathy trusts for language model standards. [93] Yann LeCun has promoted open-source models for their value to vertical applications [94] and for improving AI safety. [95]

Language models with hundreds of billions of criteria, such as GPT-4 or PaLM, usually run on datacenter computers geared up with arrays of GPUs (such as NVIDIA’s H100) or AI accelerator chips (such as Google’s TPU). These extremely big designs are generally accessed as cloud services over the Internet.

In 2022, the United States New Export Controls on Advanced Computing and Semiconductors to China imposed constraints on exports to China of GPU and AI accelerator chips used for generative AI. [96] Chips such as the NVIDIA A800 [97] and the Biren Technology BR104 [98] were developed to satisfy the requirements of the sanctions.

There is free software application on the marketplace efficient in recognizing text generated by generative expert system (such as GPTZero), in addition to images, audio or video coming from it. [99] Potential mitigation techniques for discovering generative AI material consist of digital watermarking, content authentication, details retrieval, and machine learning classifier models. [100] Despite claims of precision, both totally free and paid AI text detectors have regularly produced incorrect positives, wrongly accusing students of sending AI-generated work. [101] [102]

Law and policy

In the United States, a group of business consisting of OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta signed a voluntary arrangement with the Biden administration in July 2023 to watermark AI-generated material. [103] In October 2023, Executive Order 14110 used the Defense Production Act to need all US business to report info to the federal government when training particular high-impact AI designs. [104] [105]

In the European Union, the proposed Artificial Intelligence Act includes requirements to disclose copyrighted product used to train generative AI systems, and to identify any AI-generated output as such. [106] [107]

In China, the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services introduced by the Cyberspace Administration of China regulates any public-facing generative AI. It includes requirements to watermark produced images or videos, policies on training information and label quality, constraints on individual data collection, and a guideline that generative AI must “follow socialist core worths”. [108] [109]

Copyright

Training with copyrighted material

Generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Midjourney are trained on large, publicly offered datasets that include copyrighted works. AI designers have argued that such training is protected under fair usage, while copyright holders have actually argued that it infringes their rights. [110]

Proponents of fair usage training have argued that it is a transformative usage and does not involve making copies of copyrighted works available to the public. [110] Critics have argued that image generators such as Midjourney can produce nearly-identical copies of some copyrighted images, [111] which generative AI programs complete with the material they are trained on. [112]

As of 2024, several lawsuits associated with using copyrighted material in training are ongoing. Getty Images has taken legal action against Stability AI over using its images to train Stable diffusion. [113] Both the Authors Guild and The New York Times have taken legal action against Microsoft and OpenAI over using their works to train ChatGPT. [114] [115]

Copyright of AI-generated content

A different concern is whether AI-generated works can receive copyright protection. The United States Copyright Office has ruled that works produced by expert system with no human input can not be copyrighted, because they lack human authorship. [116] However, the workplace has likewise begun taking public input to identify if these guidelines require to be improved for generative AI. [117]

Concerns

The development of generative AI has actually raised issues from federal governments, services, and individuals, resulting in demonstrations, legal actions, contacts us to stop briefly AI experiments, and actions by multiple federal governments. In a July 2023 briefing of the United Nations Security Council, Secretary-General António Guterres mentioned “Generative AI has massive potential for excellent and wicked at scale”, that AI might “turbocharge international development” and contribute between $10 and $15 trillion to the international economy by 2030, however that its malicious use “could trigger dreadful levels of death and damage, extensive injury, and deep psychological damage on an inconceivable scale”. [118]

Job losses

From the early days of the advancement of AI, there have been arguments put forward by ELIZA creator Joseph Weizenbaum and others about whether tasks that can be done by computers in fact must be done by them, provided the difference between computers and human beings, and in between quantitative estimations and qualitative, value-based judgements. [120] In April 2023, it was reported that image generation AI has resulted in 70% of the tasks for computer game illustrators in China being lost. [121] [122] In July 2023, advancements in generative AI added to the 2023 Hollywood labor conflicts. Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild, declared that “expert system poses an existential risk to imaginative occupations” throughout the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike. [123] Voice generation AI has been viewed as a potential difficulty to the voice acting sector. [124] [125]

The intersection of AI and employment issues among underrepresented groups worldwide remains a crucial aspect. While AI assures effectiveness improvements and skill acquisition, issues about job displacement and biased recruiting processes continue amongst these groups, as laid out in surveys by Fast Company. To leverage AI for a more equitable society, proactive actions include mitigating predispositions, advocating openness, respecting privacy and approval, and accepting diverse teams and ethical considerations. Strategies include redirecting policy focus on guideline, inclusive design, and education’s potential for customized mentor to optimize benefits while reducing damages. [126]

Racial and gender predisposition

Generative AI models can reflect and magnify any cultural predisposition present in the underlying data. For instance, a language model might presume that medical professionals and judges are male, which secretaries or nurses are female, if those predispositions prevail in the training data. [127] Similarly, an image model prompted with the text “a picture of a CEO” may disproportionately create pictures of white male CEOs, [128] if trained on a racially biased information set. A variety of techniques for mitigating predisposition have actually been attempted, such as modifying input prompts [129] and reweighting training information. [130]

Deepfakes

Deepfakes (a portmanteau of “deep knowing” and “fake” [131] are AI-generated media that take a person in an existing image or video and replace them with another person’s likeness using synthetic neural networks. [132] Deepfakes have actually amassed extensive attention and concerns for their usages in deepfake celeb adult videos, revenge porn, fake news, hoaxes, health disinformation, financial fraud, and covert foreign election disturbance. [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] This has elicited reactions from both industry and government to detect and restrict their use. [140] [141]

In July 2023, the fact-checking business Logically found that the popular generative AI models Midjourney, DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion would produce plausible disinformation images when triggered to do so, such as pictures of electoral scams in the United States and Muslim females supporting India’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. [142] [143]

In April 2024, a paper proposed to use blockchain (distributed ledger innovation) to promote “transparency, verifiability, and decentralization in AI advancement and use”. [144]

Audio deepfakes

Instances of users abusing software application to generate questionable declarations in the singing style of stars, public authorities, and other famous people have raised ethical issues over voice generation AI. [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] In action, business such as ElevenLabs have stated that they would deal with mitigating prospective abuse through safeguards and identity verification. [151]

Concerns and fandoms have actually generated from AI-generated music. The same software used to clone voices has been used on popular artists’ voices to create songs that imitate their voices, getting both incredible appeal and criticism. [152] [153] [154] Similar techniques have likewise been utilized to produce improved quality or full-length variations of tunes that have been dripped or have yet to be released. [155]

Generative AI has also been utilized to produce brand-new digital artist personalities, with a few of these getting adequate attention to receive record deals at significant labels. [156] The developers of these virtual artists have likewise faced their reasonable share of criticism for their personified programs, including reaction for “dehumanizing” an artform, and likewise creating artists which develop unrealistic or unethical attract their audiences. [157]

Cybercrime

Generative AI’s capability to create sensible fake content has been made use of in numerous kinds of cybercrime, including phishing frauds. [158] Deepfake video and audio have been utilized to create disinformation and fraud. In 2020, former Google click scams czar Shuman Ghosemajumder argued that when deepfake videos end up being perfectly sensible, they would stop appearing exceptional to audiences, potentially leading to uncritical acceptance of false info. [159] Additionally, large language models and other forms of text-generation AI have been utilized to produce fake reviews of e-commerce sites to boost scores. [160] Cybercriminals have created large language designs focused on fraud, consisting of WormGPT and FraudGPT. [161]

A 2023 study revealed that generative AI can be susceptible to jailbreaks, reverse psychology and timely injection attacks, allowing aggressors to acquire assist with harmful demands, such as for crafting social engineering and phishing attacks. [162] Additionally, other scientists have demonstrated that open-source models can be fine-tuned to eliminate their safety constraints at low expense. [163]

Reliance on industry giants

Training frontier AI models requires a huge amount of computing power. Usually only Big Tech business have the financial resources to make such investments. Smaller start-ups such as Cohere and OpenAI end up purchasing access to information centers from Google and Microsoft respectively. [164]

Energy and environment

Scientists and reporters have actually revealed issues about the environmental effect that the advancement and implementation of generative models are having: high CO2 emissions, [165] [166] [167] big quantities of freshwater utilized for data centers, [168] [169] and high quantities of electrical power usage. [170] [166] [171] There is likewise concern that these effects may increase as these designs are incorporated into commonly used search engines such as Google Search and Bing; [170] as chatbots and other applications become more popular; [170] [169] and as designs require to be re-trained. [170]

Proposed mitigation techniques include factoring possible ecological costs prior to model development or information collection, [165] increasing efficiency of data centers to lower electricity/energy use, [168] [170] [166] [169] [171] [167] building more effective machine finding out designs, [168] [166] [169] minimizing the variety of times that models need to be retrained, [167] establishing a government-directed structure for auditing the ecological effect of these models, [168] [167] regulating for transparency of these models, [167] regulating their energy and water usage, [168] motivating scientists to release information on their designs’ carbon footprint, [170] [167] and increasing the number of subject experts who comprehend both artificial intelligence and environment science. [167]

Content quality

The New york city Times specifies slop as comparable to spam: “inferior or undesirable A.I. content in social networks, art, books and … in search results page.” [172] Journalists have expressed concerns about the scale of low-grade generated content with regard to social networks material moderation, [173] the monetary incentives from social media companies to spread such content, [173] [174] false political messaging, [174] spamming of scientific research study paper submissions, [175] increased effort and time to discover higher quality or desired content on the Internet, [176] the indexing of produced material by online search engine, [177] and on journalism itself. [178]

A paper released by researchers at Amazon Web Services AI Labs discovered that over 57% of sentences from a sample of over 6 billion sentences from Common Crawl, a photo of web pages, were maker equated. Many of these automated translations were viewed as lower quality, especially for sentences that were translated throughout a minimum of three languages. Many lower-resource languages (ex. Wolof, Xhosa) were translated throughout more languages than higher-resource languages (ex. English, French). [179] [180]

In September 2024, Robyn Speer, the author of wordfreq, an open source database that determined word frequencies based on text from the Internet, announced that she had actually stopped updating the information for a number of factors: high costs for getting data from Reddit and Twitter, excessive focus on generative AI compared to other approaches in the natural language processing neighborhood, and that “generative AI has polluted the information”. [181]

The adoption of generative AI tools caused a surge of AI-generated content throughout numerous domains. A study from University College London approximated that in 2023, more than 60,000 academic articles-over 1% of all publications-were most likely composed with LLM assistance. [182] According to Stanford University’s Institute for Human-Centered AI, around 17.5% of freshly published computer technology documents and 16.9% of peer evaluation text now include content created by LLMs. [183]

Visual content follows a similar trend. Since the launch of DALL-E 2 in 2022, it is estimated that approximately 34 million images have been produced daily. As of August 2023, more than 15 billion images had been generated using text-to-image algorithms, with 80% of these developed by designs based upon Stable Diffusion. [184]

If AI-generated content is consisted of in brand-new information crawls from the Internet for extra training of AI designs, defects in the resulting designs might happen. [185] Training an AI design exclusively on the output of another AI model produces a lower-quality model. Repeating this process, where each brand-new model is trained on the previous model’s output, leads to progressive degradation and eventually leads to a “model collapse” after numerous versions. [186] Tests have actually been carried out with pattern recognition of handwritten letters and with images of human faces. [187] As a consequence, the worth of information gathered from authentic human interactions with systems might become progressively valuable in the existence of LLM-generated material in information crawled from the Internet.

On the other side, artificial information is typically used as an alternative to information produced by real-world events. Such data can be released to confirm mathematical models and to train artificial intelligence models while maintaining user privacy, [188] including for structured information. [189] The method is not limited to text generation; image generation has actually been employed to train computer system vision models. [190]

Misuse in journalism

In January 2023, Futurism.com broke the story that CNET had actually been utilizing a concealed internal AI tool to compose at least 77 of its stories; after the news broke, CNET published corrections to 41 of the stories. [191]

In April 2023, the German tabloid Die Aktuelle released a fake AI-generated interview with previous racing driver Michael Schumacher, who had not made any public appearances considering that 2013 after sustaining a brain injury in a skiing accident. The story consisted of two possible disclosures: the cover included the line “stealthily real”, and the interview included an acknowledgment at the end that it was AI-generated. The editor-in-chief was fired quickly thereafter amid the debate. [192]

Other outlets that have published short articles whose content and/or byline have been validated or presumed to be developed by generative AI designs – typically with incorrect material, errors, and/or non-disclosure of generative AI usage – include:

– NewsBreak [193] [194]- outlets owned by Arena Group Sports Illustrated [195] TheStreet [195] Men’s Journal [196]
The Columbus Dispatch [198] [199] Reviewed [200] USA Today [201]
Gizmodo [205] Jalopnik [205] A.V. Club [205] [206] Quartz [207]
Bankrate [209]
Yoga Journal [201] Backpacker [201] Clean Eating [201]
Miami Herald [201] Sacramento Bee [201] Tacoma News Tribune [201] The Rock Hill Herald [201] The Modesto Bee [201] Fort Worth Star-Telegram [201] Merced Sun-Star [201] Ledger-Enquirer [201] The Kansas City Star [201] Raleigh News & Observer [217]
PC Magazine [201] Mashable [201] AskMen [201]
Good Housekeeping [201]
People [201] Parents [201] Food & Wine [201] InStyle [201] Real Simple [201] Travel + Leisure [201] Better Homes & Gardens [201] Southern Living [201]
LA Weekly [218] The Village Voice [218]

In May 2024, Futurism kept in mind that a content management system video by AdVon Commerce, who had used generative AI to produce posts for a lot of the previously mentioned outlets, appeared to show that they “had produced 10s of thousands of short articles for more than 150 publishers.” [201]

News broadcasters in Kuwait, Greece, South Korea, India, China and Taiwan have actually presented news with anchors based upon Generative AI models, triggering issues about task losses for human anchors and audience trust in news that has traditionally been influenced by parasocial relationships with broadcasters, material creators or social media influencers. [220] [221] [222] Algorithmically produced anchors have also been utilized by allies of ISIS for their broadcasts. [223]

In 2023, Google apparently pitched a tool to news outlets that declared to “produce newspaper article” based on input information offered, such as “information of current events”. Some news company executives who saw the pitch explained it as” [taking] for granted the effort that went into producing accurate and artful news stories.” [224]

In February 2024, Google launched a program to pay small publishers to compose 3 posts daily using a beta generative AI model. The program does not require the understanding or permission of the sites that the publishers are using as sources, nor does it require the released short articles to be identified as being created or helped by these designs. [225]

Many defunct news sites (The Hairpin, The Frisky, Apple Daily, Ashland Daily Tidings, Clayton County Register, Southwest Journal) and blog sites (The Unofficial Apple Weblog, iLounge) have gone through cybersquatting, with short articles produced by generative AI. [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [231] [232] [233]

United States Senators Richard Blumenthal and Amy Klobuchar have revealed concern that generative AI might have a damaging influence on regional news. [234] In July 2023, OpenAI partnered with the American Journalism Project to money local news outlets for try out generative AI, with Axios noting the possibility of generative AI companies developing a dependence for these news outlets. [235]

Meta AI, a chatbot based upon Llama 3 which sums up newspaper article, was kept in mind by The Washington Post to copy sentences from those stories without direct attribution and to potentially further reduce the traffic of online news outlets. [236]

In response to potential risks around the use and misuse of generative AI in journalism and concerns about decreasing audience trust, outlets all over the world, including publications such as Wired, Associated Press, The Quint, Rappler or The Guardian have published guidelines around how they plan to utilize and not utilize AI and generative AI in their work. [237] [238] [239] [240]

In June 2024, Reuters Institute released their Digital New Report for 2024. In a survey of individuals in America and Europe, Reuters Institute reports that 52% and 47% respectively are uneasy with news produced by “primarily AI with some human oversight”, and 23% and 15% respectively report being comfortable. 42% of Americans and 33% of Europeans reported that they were comfy with news produced by “mainly human with some assistance from AI”. The results of international surveys reported that individuals were more unpleasant with news subjects consisting of politics (46%), criminal offense (43%), and local news (37%) produced by AI than other news subjects. [241]

Computer programming portal

Technology portal

Artificial general intelligence – Kind of AI with extensive abilities
Artificial creativity – Artificial simulation of human creativity
Artificial intelligence art – Visual media created with AI
Artificial life – Discipline
Chatbot – Program that simulates discussion
Computational creativity – Multidisciplinary endeavour
Generative adversarial network – Deep knowing method
Generative pre-trained transformer – Type of large language design
Large language model – Kind of maker learning model
Music and expert system – Usage of synthetic intelligence to produce music
Generative AI porn – Explicit material produced by generative AI
Procedural generation – Method in which information is developed algorithmically instead of manually
Retrieval-augmented generation – Kind of information retrieval utilizing LLMs
Stochastic parrot – Term utilized in device learning

References

^ Newsom, Gavin; Weber, Shirley N. (September 5, 2023). “Executive Order N-12-23” (PDF). Executive Department, State of California. Archived (PDF) from the initial on February 21, 2024. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
^ Pinaya, Walter H. L.; Graham, Mark S.; Kerfoot, Eric; Tudosiu, Petru-Daniel; Dafflon, Jessica; Fernandez, Virginia; Sanchez, Pedro; Wolleb, Julia; da Costa, Pedro F.; Patel, Ashay (2023 ). “Generative AI for Medical Imaging: extending the MONAI Framework”. arXiv:2307.15208 [eess.IV]
^ “What is ChatGPT, DALL-E, and generative AI?”. McKinsey. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
^ “What is generative AI?”. IBM. March 22, 2024.
^ Pasick, Adam (March 27, 2023). “Expert System Glossary: Neural Networks and Other Terms Explained”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on September 1, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
^ Karpathy, Andrej; Abbeel, Pieter; Brockman, Greg; Chen, Peter; Cheung, Vicki; Duan, Yan; Goodfellow, Ian; Kingma, Durk; Ho, Jonathan; Rein Houthooft; Tim Salimans; John Schulman; Ilya Sutskever; Wojciech Zaremba (June 16, 2016). “Generative designs”. OpenAI. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ a b Griffith, Erin; Metz, Cade (January 27, 2023). “Anthropic Said to Be Closing In on $300 Million in New A.I. Funding”. The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on December 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Lanxon, Nate; Bass, Dina; Davalos, Jackie (March 10, 2023). “A Cheat Sheet to AI Buzzwords and Their Meanings”. Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (March 14, 2023). “OpenAI Plans to Up the Ante in Tech’s A.I. Race”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on March 31, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
^ Thoppilan, Romal; De Freitas, Daniel; Hall, Jamie; Shazeer, Noam; Kulshreshtha, Apoorv (January 20, 2022). “LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications”. arXiv:2201.08239 [cs.CL]
^ Roose, Kevin (October 21, 2022). “A Coming-Out Party for Generative A.I., Silicon Valley’s New Craze”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 15, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ a b Metz, Cade (February 15, 2024). “OpenAI Unveils A.I. That Instantly Generates Eye-Popping Videos”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 15, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
^ “The race of the AI laboratories warms up”. The Economist. January 30, 2023. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Yang, June; Gokturk, Burak (March 14, 2023). “Google Cloud brings generative AI to designers, organizations, and federal governments”. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Brynjolfsson, Erik; Li, Danielle; Raymond, Lindsey R. (April 2023), Generative AI at Work (Working Paper), Working Paper Series, doi:10.3386/ w31161, archived from the initial on March 28, 2024, retrieved January 21, 2024
^ “Don’t fear an AI-induced jobs apocalypse just yet”. The Economist. March 6, 2023. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Coyle, Jake (September 27, 2023). “In Hollywood writers’ fight versus AI, people win (for now)”. AP News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on April 3, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Harreis, H.; Koullias, T.; Roberts, Roger. “Generative AI: Unlocking the future of style”. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ “How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity”. Harvard Business Review. June 16, 2023. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the initial on June 20, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
^ Hendrix, Justin (May 16, 2023). “Transcript: Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Oversight of AI”. techpolicy.press. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Simon, Felix M.; Altay, Sacha; Mercier, Hugo (October 18, 2023). “Misinformation reloaded? Fears about the effect of generative AI on misinformation are overblown”. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. doi:10.37016/ mr-2020-127. S2CID 264113883. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved November 16, 2023.
^ “New AI systems collide with copyright law”. BBC News. August 1, 2023. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
^ Newquist, H. P. (1994 ). The Brain Makers: Genius, Ego, And Greed In The Quest For Machines That Think. New York: Macmillan/SAMS. pp. 45-53. ISBN 978-0-672-30412-5.
^ Sharkey, Noel (July 4, 2007), A programmable robot from 60 AD, vol. 2611, New Scientist, archived from the initial on January 13, 2018, recovered October 22, 2019
^ Brett, Gerard (July 1954), “The Automata in the Byzantine “Throne of Solomon””, Speculum, 29 (3 ): 477-487, doi:10.2307/ 2846790, ISSN 0038-7134, JSTOR 2846790, S2CID 163031682.
^ kelinich (March 8, 2014). “Maillardet’s Automaton”. The Franklin Institute. Archived from the original on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
^ Grinstead, Charles Miller; Snell, James Laurie (1997 ). Introduction to Probability. American Mathematical Society. pp. 464-466. ISBN 978-0-8218-0749-1.
^ Bremaud, Pierre (March 9, 2013). Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues. Springer Science & Business Media. p. ix. ISBN 978-1-4757-3124-8. Archived from the original on March 23, 2017.
^ Hayes, Brian (2013 ). “First Links in the Markov Chain”. American Scientist. 101 (2 ): 92. doi:10.1511/ 2013.101.92. ISSN 0003-0996. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved September 24, 2023.
^ Fine, Shai; Singer, Yoram; Tishby, Naftali (July 1, 1998). “The Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model: Analysis and Applications”. Machine Learning. 32 (1 ): 41-62. doi:10.1023/ A:1007469218079. ISSN 1573-0565. S2CID 3465810.
^ Crevier, Daniel (1993 ). AI: The Tumultuous Search for Expert System. New York City, New York City: BasicBooks. p. 109. ISBN 0-465-02997-3.
^ Bergen, Nathan; Huang, Angela (2023 ). “A Brief History of Generative AI” (PDF). Dichotomies: Generative AI: Navigating Towards a Better Future (2 ): 4. Archived (PDF) from the initial on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 8, 2023.
^ a b Alting, Leo; Zhang, Hongchao (1989 ). “Computer helped procedure preparation: the state-of-the-art study”. The International Journal of Production Research. 27 (4 ): 553-585. doi:10.1080/ 00207548908942569. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved October 3, 2023.
^ Chien, Steve (1998 ). “Automated preparation and scheduling for goal-based autonomous spacecraft”. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications. 13 (5 ): 50-55. doi:10.1109/ 5254.722362.
^ Burstein, Mark H., ed. (1994 ). ARPA/Rome Laboratory Knowledge-based Planning and Scheduling Initiative Workshop Proceedings. The Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Defense, and Rome Laboratory, US Flying Force, Griffiss AFB. p. 219. ISBN 155860345X.
^ Pell, Barney; Bernard, Douglas E.; Chien, Steve A.; Gat, Erann; Muscettola, Nicola; Nayak, P. Pandurang; Wagner, Michael D.; Williams, Brian C. (1998 ). Bekey, George A. (ed.). An Autonomous Spacecraft Agent Prototype. Autonomous Robots Volume 5, No. 1. pp. 29-45. Our deliberator is a traditional generative AI coordinator based on the HSTS preparation structure (Muscettola, 1994), and our control part is a traditional spacecraft mindset control system (Hackney et al. 1993). We likewise add an architectural part clearly dedicated to world modeling (the mode identifier), and differentiate between control and tracking.
^ Jebara, Tony (2012 ). Artificial intelligence: discriminative and generative. Vol. 755. Springer Science & Business Media.
^ Cao, Yihan; Li, Siyu; Liu, Yixin; Yan, Zhiling; Dai, Yutong; Yu, Philip S.; Sun, Lichao (March 7, 2023). “An Extensive Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT”. arXiv:2303.04226 [cs.AI]
^ “finetune-transformer-lm”. GitHub. Archived from the original on May 19, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Radford, Alec; Wu, Jeffrey; Child, Rewon; Luan, David; Amodei, Dario; Sutskever, Ilya (2019 ). “Language designs are not being watched multitask students” (PDF). OpenAI Blog.
^ Radford, Alec (June 11, 2018). “Improving language understanding with without supervision knowing”. OpenAI. Retrieved October 6, 2024.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines using Machine Learning”. Towards Data Science. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Anirudh VK (March 18, 2023). “Deepfakes Are Elevating Meme Culture, But At What Cost?”. Analytics India Magazine. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2024. Retrieved December 18, 2024. While AI voice memes have been around in some type considering that ’15. ai’ introduced in 2020, […] ^ Coldewey, Devin (January 5, 2021). “OpenAI’s DALL-E produces plausible pictures of actually anything you ask it to”. TechCrunch. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ “Stable Diffusion Public Release”. Stability AI. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Lock, Samantha (December 5, 2022). “What is AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it change humans?”. The Guardian. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Huang, Haomiao (August 23, 2023). “How ChatGPT turned generative AI into an “anything tool””. Ars Technica. Retrieved September 21, 2024.
^ Bubeck, Sébastien; Chandrasekaran, Varun; Eldan, Ronen; Gehrke, Johannes; Horvitz, Eric; Kamar, Ece; Lee, Peter; Lee, Yin Tat; Li, Yuanzhi; Lundberg, Scott; Nori, Harsha; Palangi, Hamid; Ribeiro, Marco Tulio; Zhang, Yi (March 22, 2023). “Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early try outs GPT-4”. arXiv:2303.12712 [cs.CL]
^ Schlagwein, Daniel; Willcocks, Leslie (September 13, 2023). “ChatGPT et al: The Ethics of Using (Generative) Expert System in Research and Science”. Journal of Information Technology. 38 (2 ): 232-238. doi:10.1177/ 02683962231200411. S2CID 261753752.
^ “Meta open-sources multisensory AI design that integrates six types of information”. May 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
^ Kruppa, Miles (December 6, 2023). “Google Announces AI System Gemini After Turmoil at Rival OpenAI”. The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Edwards, Benj (December 6, 2023). “Google introduces Gemini-a powerful AI design it states can exceed GPT-4”. Ars Technica. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (February 8, 2024). “Google Releases Gemini, an A.I.-Driven Chatbot and Voice Assistant”. The New York Times. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
^ “Introducing the next generation of Claude”. Retrieved March 4, 2024.
^ Nuñez, Michael (March 4, 2024). “Anthropic unveils Claude 3, surpassing GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra in benchmark tests”. Venture Beat. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
^ Pierce, David (June 20, 2024). “Anthropic has a quick new AI design – and a clever brand-new way to interact with chatbots”. The Verge. Retrieved June 22, 2024.
^ Baptista, Eduardo (July 9, 2024). “China leads the world in adoption of generative AI, study programs”. Reuters. Retrieved July 14, 2024.
^ “A History of Generative AI: From GAN to GPT-4”. March 21, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 10, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
^ “Explainer: What is Generative AI, the innovation behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT?”. Reuters. March 17, 2023. Archived from the original on March 30, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
^ Roose, Kevin (February 16, 2023). “Bing’s A.I. Chat: ‘I Want to Live.'”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 15, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Bommasani, R.; Hudson, D. A.; Adeli, E.; Altman, R.; Arora, S.; von Arx, S.; Bernstein, M. S.; Bohg, J.; Bosselut, A; Brunskill, E.; Brynjolfsson, E. (August 16, 2021). “On the opportunities and risks of foundation designs”. arXiv:2108.07258 [cs.LG]
^ Chen, Ming; Tworek, Jakub; Jun, Hongyu; Yuan, Qinyuan; Pinto, Hanyu Philippe De Oliveira; Kaplan, Jerry; Edwards, Haley; Burda, Yannick; Joseph, Nicholas; Brockman, Greg; Ray, Alvin (July 6, 2021). “Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code”. arXiv:2107.03374 [cs.LG]
^ “Purchasing Cursor”. Andreesen Horowitz.
^ Epstein, Ziv; Hertzmann, Aaron; Akten, Memo; Farid, Hany; Fjeld, Jessica; Frank, Morgan R. ; Groh, Matthew; Herman, Laura; Leach, Neil; Mahari, Robert; Pentland, Alex “Sandy”; Russakovsky, Olga; Schroeder, Hope; Smith, Amy (2023 ). “Art and the science of generative AI”. Science. 380 (6650 ): 1110-1111. arXiv:2306.04141. Bibcode:2023 Sci … 380.1110 E. doi:10.1126/ science.adh4451. PMID 37319193. S2CID 259095707.
^ Ramesh, Aditya; Pavlov, Mikhail; Goh, Gabriel; Gray, Scott; Voss, Chelsea; Radford, Alec; Chen, Mark; Sutskever, Ilya (2021 ). “Zero-shot text-to-image generation”. International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR. pp. 8821-8831.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines using Machine Learning”. Towards Data Science. Archived from the initial on January 21, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the initial on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Ruppert, Liana (January 18, 2021). “Make Portal’s GLaDOS And Other Beloved Characters Say The Weirdest Things With This App”. Game Informer. Archived from the original on January 18, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Kurosawa, Yuki (January 19, 2021). “ゲームキャラ音声読み上げソフト 15. ai 公開中 。 Undertale や Portal のキャラに好きなセリフを言ってもらえる” [Game Character Voice Reading Software “15. ai” Now Available. Get Characters from Undertale and Portal to Say Your Desired Lines] AUTOMATON (in Japanese). Archived from the initial on January 19, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024. 英語版ボイスのみなので注意 。; もうひとつ15.aiの大きな特徴として挙げられるのが 、 豊かな感情表現だ 。 [Please keep in mind that just English voices are available.; Another major function of 15. ai is its rich psychological expression.] ^ Desai, Saahil (July 17, 2023). “A Voicebot Just Left Me Speechless”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Agostinelli, Andrea; Denk, Timo I.; Borsos, Zalán; Engel, Jesse; Verzetti, Mauro; Caillon, Antoine; Huang, Qingqing; Jansen, Aren; Roberts, Adam; Tagliasacchi, Marco; Sharifi, Matt; Zeghidour, Neil; Frank, Christian (January 26, 2023). “MusicLM: Generating Music From Text”. arXiv:2301.11325 [cs.SD]
^ Dalugdug, Mandy (August 3, 2023). “Meta in June said that it used 20,000 hours of licensed music to train MusicGen, that included 10,000 “high-quality” licensed music tracks. At the time, Meta’s researchers outlined in a paper the ethical challenges that they came across around the development of generative AI models like MusicGen”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023.
^ “Jay-Z’s Delaware producer sparks argument over AI rights”. Archived from the original on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ “10 “Best” AI Music Generators (April 2024) – Unite.AI“. October 19, 2022. Archived from the original on January 29, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ Metz, Cade (April 4, 2023). “Instant Videos Could Represent the Next Leap in A.I. Technology”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
^ Wong, Queenie (September 29, 2022). “Facebook Parent Meta’s AI Tool Can Create Artsy Videos From Text”. cnet.com. Archived from the initial on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 4, 2023.
^ Yang, Sherry; Du, Yilun (April 12, 2023). “UniPi: Learning universal policies via text-guided video generation”. Google Research, Brain Team. Google AI Blog. Archived from the original on May 24, 2023.
^ Brohan, Anthony (2023 ). “RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control”. arXiv:2307.15818 [cs.RO]
^ Abdullahi, Aminu (November 17, 2023). “10 Best Artificial Intelligence (AI) 3D Generators”. eWEEK. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “Slash CAD model construct times with new AI-driven part creation methodology|GlobalSpec”. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “The Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the CAD Industry”. March 22, 2023. Archived from the initial on February 9, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Sabin, Sam (June 30, 2023). “GitHub has a vision to make code more safe by style”. Axios Codebook. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (March 20, 2023). “Text-to-video AI inches more detailed as startup Runway reveals brand-new model”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on September 27, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Text-to-video is the next frontier for generative AI, though present output is rudimentary. Runway states it’ll be making its new generative video design, Gen-2, readily available to users in ‘the coming weeks.’
^ Vanian, Jonathan (March 16, 2023). “Microsoft includes OpenAI technology to Word and Excel”. CNBC. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Microsoft is bringing generative synthetic intelligence technologies such as the popular ChatGPT talking app to its Microsoft 365 suite of business software application … the new A.I. features, dubbed Copilot, will be offered in some of the company’s most popular service apps, including Word, PowerPoint and Excel.
^ Wilson, Mark (August 15, 2023). “The app’s Memories feature just got a huge upgrade”. TechRadar. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. The Google Photos app is getting a revamped, AI-powered Memories function … you’ll have the ability to use generative AI to come up with some recommended names like “a desert experience”.
^ Sullivan, Laurie (May 23, 2023). “Adobe Adds Generative AI To Photoshop”. MediaPost. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) will become one of the most crucial functions for creative designers and marketers. Adobe on Tuesday revealed a Generative Fill feature in Photoshop to bring Firefly’s AI abilities into style.
^ Michael Nuñez (July 19, 2023). “LLaMA 2: How to gain access to and usage Meta’s versatile open-source chatbot right now”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on November 3, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. If you want to run LLaMA 2 by yourself maker or modify the code, you can download it directly from Hugging Face, a leading platform for sharing AI models.
^ Pounder, Les (March 25, 2023). “How To Create Your Own AI Chatbot Server With Raspberry Pi 4”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Using a Pi 4 with 8GB of RAM, you can develop a ChatGPT-like server based on LLaMA.
^ Kemper, Jonathan (November 10, 2022). “”Draw Things” App brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone”. The Decoder. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Draw Things is an app that brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone. The AI images are generated locally, so you don’t require a Web connection.
^ Witt, Allan (July 7, 2023). “Best Computer to Run LLaMA AI Model in the house (GPU, CPU, RAM, SSD)”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. To run LLaMA design at home, you will need a computer system develop with a powerful GPU that can deal with the big quantity of information and calculation needed for inferencing.
^ Westover, Brian (September 28, 2023). “Who Needs ChatGPT? How to Run Your Own Free and Private AI Chatbot”. Ziff Davis. Archived from the initial on January 7, 2024. Retrieved January 7, 2024.
^ @karpathy (December 20, 2023). “I basically only trust two LLM evals right now” (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ @ylecun (January 5, 2024). “Nabla’s shift from ChatGPT to open source LLMs …” (Tweet) – by means of Twitter.
^ @ylecun (November 1, 2023). “Open source platforms * increase * security and security” (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ Nellis, Stephen; Lee, Jane (September 1, 2022). “U.S. officials order Nvidia to stop sales of top AI chips to China”. Reuters. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Shilov, Anton (May 7, 2023). “Nvidia’s Chinese A800 GPU’s Performance Revealed”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved August 15, 2023. the A800 operates at 70% of the speed of A100 GPUs while complying with stringent U.S. export requirements that restrict how much processing power Nvidia can offer.
^ Patel, Dylan (October 24, 2022). “How China’s Biren Is Attempting To Evade US Sanctions”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ “5 totally free software to acknowledge phony AI-generated images” (in Italian). October 28, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved October 29, 2023.
^ “Detecting AI fingerprints: A guide to watermarking and beyond”. Brookings Institution. January 4, 2024. Archived from the original on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (April 3, 2023). “We evaluated a new ChatGPT-detector for instructors. It flagged an innocent student”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the original on March 28, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (June 2, 2023). “Detecting AI may be difficult. That’s a huge issue for teachers”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the initial on June 3, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Bartz, Diane; Hu, Krystal (July 21, 2023). “OpenAI, Google, others pledge to watermark AI content for security, White House says”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023.
^ “FACT SHEET: President Biden Issues Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence”. The White House. October 30, 2023. Archived from the initial on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Burt, Andrew (October 31, 2023). “3 Obstacles to Regulating Generative AI”. Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the original on February 17, 2024. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
^ “EU AI Act: very first regulation on artificial intelligence”. European Parliament. August 6, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
^ Chee, Foo Yun; Mukherjee, Supantha (June 14, 2023). “EU lawmakers elect tougher AI guidelines as draft relocations to last phase”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
^ Ye, Josh (July 13, 2023). “China says generative AI guidelines to use just to products for the public”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
^ “生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法”. July 13, 2023. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ a b “Generative Expert system and Copyright Law”. Congressional Research Service. LSB10922. September 29, 2023. Archived from the original on March 22, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Thompson, Stuart (January 25, 2024). “We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image”. The New York Times. Archived from the initial on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Hadero, Haleluya; Bauder, David (December 27, 2023). “The New york city Times sues OpenAI and Microsoft for utilizing its stories to train chatbots”. Associated Press News. AP News. Archived from the original on December 27, 2023. Retrieved April 13, 2023.
^ O’Brien, Matt (September 25, 2023). “Photo giant Getty took a leading AI image-maker to court. Now it’s also welcoming the innovation”. AP NEWS. Associated Press. Archived from the initial on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Barber, Gregory (December 9, 2023). “The Generative AI Copyright Fight Is Just Beginning”. Wired. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Bruell, Alexandra (December 27, 2023). “New York City Times Sues Microsoft and OpenAI, Alleging Copyright Infringement”. Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Brittain, Blake (August 21, 2023). “AI-generated art can not receive copyrights, US court says”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on January 20, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ David, Emilla (August 29, 2023). “US Copyright Office wishes to hear what people consider AI and copyright”. The Verge. Archived from the original on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ “Secretary-General’s remarks to the Security Council on Expert System”. un.org. July 18, 2023. Archived from the original on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ “The Writers Strike Is Deciding on AI”. Time. May 4, 2023. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. June 11, 2023.
^ Tarnoff, Ben (August 4, 2023). “Lessons from Eliza”. The Guardian Weekly. pp. 34-39.
^ Zhou, Viola (April 11, 2023). “AI is already taking computer game illustrators’ jobs in China”. Rest of World. Archived from the original on August 13, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Carter, Justin (April 11, 2023). “China’s game art market apparently decimated by growing AI utilize”. Game Developer. Archived from the initial on August 17, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Collier, Kevin (July 14, 2023). “Actors vs. AI: Strike brings focus to emerging usage of innovative tech”. NBC News. Archived from the original on July 20, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023. SAG-AFTRA has actually joined the Writer’s [sic] Guild of America in demanding an agreement that explicitly requires AI policies to safeguard authors and the works they develop. … The future of generative expert system in Hollywood-and how it can be utilized to replace labor-has end up being a crucial sticking point for actors going on strike. In a press conference Thursday, Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (more commonly understood as SAG-AFTRA), stated that ‘expert system presents an existential danger to creative occupations, and all stars and entertainers are worthy of contract language that protects them from having their identity and skill exploited without authorization and pay.’
^ Wiggers, Kyle (August 22, 2023). “ElevenLabs’ voice-generating tools launch out of beta”. TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on November 28, 2023. Retrieved September 25, 2023.
^ Shrivastava, Rashi. “‘Keep Your Paws Off My Voice’: Voice Actors Worry Generative AI Will Steal Their Livelihoods”. Forbes. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Gupta, Shalene (October 31, 2023). “Underrepresented groups in nations around the globe are fretted about AI being a threat to tasks”. Fast Company. Archived from the initial on December 8, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
^ Rachel Gordon (March 3, 2023). “Large language models are prejudiced. Can logic assist in saving them?”. MIT CSAIL. Archived from the initial on January 23, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ OpenAI (July 18, 2022). “Reducing bias and improving security in DALL · E 2”. OpenAI. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Jake Traylor (July 27, 2022). “No fast repair: How OpenAI’s DALL · E 2 highlighted the obstacles of bias in AI”. NBC News. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ “DALL · E 2 pre-training mitigations”. OpenAI. June 28, 2022. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Brandon, John (February 16, 2018). “Terrifying modern porn: Creepy ‘deepfake’ videos are on the rise”. Fox News. Archived from the initial on June 15, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ Cole, Samantha (January 24, 2018). “We Are Truly Fucked: Everyone Is Making AI-Generated Fake Porn Now”. Vice. Archived from the initial on September 7, 2019. Retrieved May 4, 2019.
^ “What Are Deepfakes & Why the Future of Porn is Terrifying”. Highsnobiety. February 20, 2018. Archived from the initial on July 14, 2021. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ “Experts fear face swapping tech might start a worldwide showdown”. The Outline. Archived from the initial on January 16, 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
^ Roose, Kevin (March 4, 2018). “Here Come the Fake Videos, Too”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on June 18, 2019. Retrieved March 24, 2018.
^ Schreyer, Marco; Sattarov, Timur; Reimer, Bernd; Borth, Damian (2019 ). “Adversarial Learning of Deepfakes in Accounting”. arXiv:1910.03810 [cs.LG]
^ Menz, Bradley (2024 ). “Health Disinformation Use Case Highlighting the Urgent Need for Artificial Intelligence Vigilance”. JAMA Internal Medicine. 184 (1 ): 92-96. doi:10.1001/ jamainternmed.2023.5947. PMID 37955873. S2CID 265148637. Archived from the initial on February 4, 2024. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
^ Chalfant, Morgan (March 6, 2024). “U.S. braces for foreign disturbance in 2024 election”. Semafor. Archived from the original on March 11, 2024. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
^ Menn, Joseph (September 23, 2024). “Russia, Iran use AI to improve anti-U.S. impact campaigns, authorities state”. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on September 24, 2024. Retrieved September 23, 2024.
^ “Join the Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC)”. deepfakedetectionchallenge.ai. Archived from the original on January 12, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2019.
^ Clarke, Yvette D. (June 28, 2019). “H.R. 3230 – 116th Congress (2019-2020): Defending Each and Every Person from False Appearances by Keeping Exploitation Subject to Accountability Act of 2019”. www.congress.gov. Archived from the original on December 17, 2019. Retrieved October 16, 2019.
^ “New Research Reveals Scale of Threat Posed by AI-generated Images on 2024 Elections”. Logically. July 27, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 3, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
^ Lawton, Graham (September 12, 2023). “Disinformation wars: The battle versus fake news in the age of AI”. New Scientist. Retrieved July 5, 2024.
^ Brewer, Jordan; Patel, Dhru; Kim, Dennie; Murray, Alex (April 12, 2024). “Navigating the difficulties of generative technologies: Proposing the integration of expert system and blockchain”. Business Horizons. 67 (5 ): 525-535. doi:10.1016/ j.bushor.2024.04.011. ISSN 0007-6813.
^ “People Are Still Terrible: AI Voice-Cloning Tool Misused for Deepfake Celeb Clips”. PCMag Middle East. January 31, 2023. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “The generative A.I. software application race has begun”. Fortune. Archived from the initial on March 25, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Milmo, Dan; Hern, Alex (May 20, 2023). “Elections in UK and US at risk from AI-driven disinformation, state professionals”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on November 16, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “Seeing is thinking? Global scramble to take on deepfakes”. news.yahoo.com. Archived from the initial on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (January 31, 2023). “4chan users embrace AI voice clone tool to produce celeb hatespeech”. The Verge. Archived from the original on December 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Thompson, Stuart A. (March 12, 2023). “Making Deepfakes Gets Cheaper and Easier Thanks to A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on October 29, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “A brand-new AI voice tool is already being abused to make deepfake celeb audio clips”. Engadget. January 31, 2023. Archived from the original on October 10, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Gee, Andre (April 20, 2023). “Even If AI-Generated Rap Songs Go Viral Doesn’t Mean They’re Good”. Rolling Stone. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Coscarelli, Joe (April 19, 2023). “An A.I. Hit of Fake ‘Drake’ and ‘The Weeknd’ Rattles the Music World”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on May 15, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
^ Lippiello, Emily; Smith, Nathan; Pereira, Ivan (November 3, 2023). “AI songs that simulate popular artists raising alarms in the music industry”. ABC News. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Skelton, Eric. “Fans Are Using Artificial Intelligence to Turn Rap Snippets Into Full Songs”. Complex. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Marr, Bernard. “Virtual Influencer Noonoouri Lands Record Deal: Is She The Future Of Music?”. Forbes. Archived from the original on December 4, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Thaler, Shannon (September 8, 2023). “Warner Music indications first-ever record deal with AI pop star”. New York Post. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Sjouwerman, Stu (December 26, 2022). “Deepfakes: Prepare yourself for phishing 2.0”. Fast Company. Archived from the initial on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Sonnemaker, Tyler. “As social media platforms brace for the inbound wave of deepfakes, Google’s former ‘fraud czar’ anticipates the biggest risk is that deepfakes will ultimately end up being dull”. Business Insider. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Collinson, Patrick (July 15, 2023). “Fake reviews: can we trust what we checked out online as use of AI explodes?”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 22, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ “After WormGPT, FraudGPT Emerges to Help Scammers Steal Your Data”. PCMAG. July 25, 2023. Archived from the original on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Gupta, Maanak; Akiri, Charankumar; Aryal, Kshitiz; Parker, Eli; Praharaj, Lopamudra (2023 ). “From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy”. IEEE Access. 11: 80218-80245. arXiv:2307.00691. Bibcode:2023 IEEEA..1180218 G. doi:10.1109/ ACCESS.2023.3300381. S2CID 259316122.
^ Piper, Kelsey (February 2, 2024). “Should we make our most powerful AI designs open source to all?”. Vox. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
^ Metz, Cade (July 10, 2023). “In the Age of A.I., Tech’s Little Guys Need Big Friends”. New York City Times.
^ a b Bender, Emily M.; Gebru, Timnit; McMillan-Major, Angelina; Shmitchell, Shmargaret (March 1, 2021). “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models be Too Big?”. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAccT ’21. New York City, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 610-623. doi:10.1145/ 3442188.3445922. ISBN 978-1-4503-8309-7.
^ a b c d “AI is an energy hog. This is what it suggests for environment change”. MIT Technology Review. May 23, 2024. Archived from the original on August 20, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f g Dhar, Payal (August 1, 2020). “The carbon impact of expert system”. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2 (8 ): 423-425. doi:10.1038/ s42256-020-0219-9. ISSN 2522-5839. Archived from the original on August 14, 2024.
^ a b c d e Crawford, Kate (February 20, 2024). “Generative AI’s ecological costs are soaring – and primarily secret”. Nature. 626 (8000 ): 693. Bibcode:2024 Natur.626..693 C. doi:10.1038/ d41586-024-00478-x. PMID 38378831. Archived from the original on August 22, 2024.
^ a b c d Rogers, Reece. “AI’s Energy Demands Run out Control. Welcome to the Internet’s Hyper-Consumption Era”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on August 14, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f Saenko, Kate (May 23, 2023). “Is generative AI bad for the environment? A computer scientist discusses the carbon footprint of ChatGPT and its cousins”. The Conversation. Archived from the initial on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Lohr, Steve (August 26, 2024). “Will A.I. Ruin the Planet or Save the Planet?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hoffman, Benjamin (June 11, 2024). “First Came ‘Spam.’ Now, With A.I., We have actually Got ‘Slop'”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b “Investigation Finds Actual Source of All That AI Slop on Facebook”. Futurism. August 10, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Warzel, Charlie (August 21, 2024). “The MAGA Aesthetic Is AI Slop”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on August 25, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Edwards, Benj (August 14, 2024). “Research AI design unexpectedly tries to customize its own code to extend runtime”. Ars Technica. Archived from the original on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hern, Alex; Milmo, Dan (May 19, 2024). “Spam, scrap … slop? The current wave of AI behind the ‘zombie internet'”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Cox, Joseph (January 18, 2024). “Google News Is Boosting Garbage AI-Generated Articles”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on June 13, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Beloved Local Newspapers Fired Staffers, Then Started Running AI Slop”. Futurism. July 31, 2024. Archived from the original on August 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Thompson, Brian; Dhaliwal, Mehak; Frisch, Peter; Domhan, Tobias; Federico, Marcello (August 2024). Ku, Lun-Wei; Martins, Andre; Srikumar, Vivek (eds.). “A Shocking Amount of the Web is Machine Translated: Insights from Multi-Way Parallelism”. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024. Bangkok, Thailand and virtual meeting: Association for Computational Linguistics: 1763-1775. arXiv:2401.05749. doi:10.18653/ v1/2024. findings-acl.103.
^ Roscoe, Jules (January 17, 2024). “A ‘Shocking’ Amount of the Web Is Already AI-Translated Trash, Scientists Determine”. VICE. Archived from the original on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (September 19, 2024). “Project Analyzing Human Language Usage Shuts Down Because ‘Generative AI Has Polluted the Data'”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on September 19, 2024. Retrieved September 20, 2024. While there has constantly been spam on the internet and in the datasets that Wordfreq utilized, “it was workable and typically recognizable. Large language models produce text that masquerades as genuine language with objective behind it, although there is none, and their output emerge all over,” she wrote. She gives the example that ChatGPT excessive uses the word “dive,” in such a way that people do not, which has shaken off the frequency of this specific word.
^ Gray, Andrew (March 24, 2024). “ChatGPT “contamination”: approximating the occurrence of LLMs in the scholarly literature”. arXiv:2403.16887 [cs.DL]
^ Kannan, Prabha (May 13, 2024). “Just How Much Research Is Being Written by Large Language Models?”. Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. Stanford University. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Valyaeva, Alina (August 15, 2023). “AI Image Statistics for 2024: Just How Much Content Was Created by AI”. Everypixel Journal. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Shumailov, Ilia; Shumaylov, Zakhar; Zhao, Yiren; Papernot, Nicolas; Anderson, Ross; Gal, Yarin (July 2024). “AI designs collapse when trained on recursively generated data”. Nature. 631 (8022 ): 755-759. Bibcode:2024 Natur.631..755 S. doi:10.1038/ s41586-024-07566-y. PMC 11269175. PMID 39048682.
^ Bhatia, Aatish (August 26, 2024). “When A.I.’s Output Is a Risk to A.I. Itself”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Self-Consuming Generative Models Freak”. ICLR. 2024.
^ Owen, Sean (April 12, 2023). “Synthetic Data for Better Machine Learning”. databricks.com. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Sharma, Himanshu (July 11, 2023). “Synthetic Data Platforms: Unlocking the Power of Generative AI for Structured Data”. kdnuggets.com. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Stöckl, Andreas (November 2, 2022). “Evaluating an Artificial Image Dataset Generated with Stable Diffusion”. arXiv:2211.01777 [cs.CV]
^ Roth, Emma (January 25, 2023). “CNET discovered errors in majority of its AI-written stories”. The Verge. Archived from the original on November 6, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ “A publication promoted Michael Schumacher’s first interview in years. It was really AI”. NPR. April 28, 2023. Archived from the original on June 17, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor (January 3, 2024). “Police Say AI-Generated Article About Local Murder Is “Entirely” Comprised”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “NewsBreak: Most downloaded US news app has Chinese roots and ‘writes fiction’ using AI”. Reuters. June 5, 2024. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ a b Harrison, Maggie (November 27, 2023). “Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 9, 2023). “Magazine Publishes Serious Errors in First AI-Generated Health Article”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Schneider, Jaron (December 14, 2023). “B&H Photo Published an AI-Generated Guide Written by a Phony Person”. PetaPixel. Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Harrison, Maggie (August 29, 2023). “USA Today Owner Pauses AI Articles After Butchering Sports Coverage”. Futurism. Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Buchanan, Tyler (August 28, 2023). “Dispatch stops briefly AI sports writing program”. Axios. Archived from the original on January 1, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Sommer, Will (October 26, 2023). “Mysterious bylines appeared on an U.S.A. Today site. Did these writers exist?”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on October 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab air conditioning “Meet AdVon, the AI-Powered Content Monster Infecting the Media Industry”. Futurism. May 8, 2024. Archived from the original on June 4, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ O’Sullivan, Donie; Gordon, Allison (November 2, 2023). “How Microsoft’s AI is making a mess of the news|CNN Business”. CNN. Archived from the original on November 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Meade, Amanda (July 31, 2023). “News Corp using AI to produce 3,000 Australian local news stories a week”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Tangermann, Victor (June 30, 2023). “Gizmodo Staff Furious After Site Announces Move to AI Content”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ a b c Kafka, Peter (July 18, 2023). “Coming to your web, whether you like it or not: More AI-generated stories”. Vox. Archived from the original on July 18, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Landymore, Frank; Christian, Jon (September 13, 2023). “The A.V. Club’s AI-Generated Articles Are Copying Directly From IMDb”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Stiaplame, Nordiisk (January 28, 2025). “Quartz Is Publishing AI-Generated Articles Based on Other AI Slop, In Addition To Warning They May Be Filled With Errors”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 29, 2025. Retrieved January 30, 2025.
^ Carroll, Rory (May 14, 2023). “Irish Times apologises for hoax AI article about ladies’s use of fake tan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on May 14, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 1, 2023). “CNET Sister Site Restarts AI Articles, Immediately Publishes Idiotic Error”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on November 27, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor; Christian, Jon (March 30, 2023). “BuzzFeed Is Quietly Publishing Entire AI-Generated Articles”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “Newsweek is making generative AI a component in its newsroom”. Nieman Lab. April 17, 2024. Archived from the original on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “What’s in a byline? For Hoodline’s AI-generated regional news, whatever – and absolutely nothing”. Nieman Lab. June 3, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “AI-generated news is here from S.F.-based Hoodline. What does that mean for traditional publishers?”. San Francisco Chronicle. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 5, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ Gold, Hadas (May 30, 2024). “A national network of regional news websites is releasing AI-written posts under phony bylines. Experts are raising alarm”. CNN. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “Wyoming reporter caught using expert system to produce phony quotes and stories”. Associated Press. August 14, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Cosmos Magazine releases AI-generated articles, drawing criticism from journalists, co-founders”. ABC News. August 7, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI-generated articles are penetrating significant news publications”. National Public Radio. May 16, 2024. Archived from the original on June 19, 2024. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
^ a b c Knibbs, Kate (July 30, 2024). “Zombie Alt-Weeklies Are Stuffed With AI Slop About OnlyFans”. Wired. Archived from the original on August 11, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Apple states it will upgrade AI feature after inaccurate news informs”. The Guardian. January 7, 2025. Archived from the original on January 14, 2025. Retrieved January 14, 2025.
^ “TV channels are utilizing AI-generated speakers to read the news. The question is, will we trust them?”. BBC News. January 26, 2024. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Tait, Amelia (October 20, 2023). “‘Here is the news. You can’t stop us’: AI anchor Zae-In grants us an interview”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on January 28, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kuo, Lily (November 9, 2018). “World’s very first AI news anchor revealed in China”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on February 20, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “These ISIS news anchors are AI phonies. Their propaganda is real”. Washington Post. May 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Mullin, Benjamin; Grant, Nico (July 20, 2023). “Google Tests A.I. Tool That Has The Ability To Write News Articles”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on May 16, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Stenberg, Mark (February 27, 2024). “Google Is Paying Publishers Five-Figure Sums to Test an Unreleased Gen AI Platform”. Adweek. Archived from the initial on March 9, 2024. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 7, 2024). “Confessions of an AI Clickbait Kingpin”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on May 18, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (January 26, 2024). “How Beloved Indie Blog ‘The Hairpin’ Developed Into an AI Clickbait Farm”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on April 14, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (July 9, 2024). “A Precious Tech Blog Is Now Publishing AI Articles Under the Names of Its Old Human Staff”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hollister, Sean (July 10, 2024). “Early Apple tech blog writers are surprised to discover their name and work have been AI-zombified”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI slop is currently getting into Oregon’s regional journalism”. Oregon Public Broadcasting. December 9, 2024. Archived from the original on December 9, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 26, 2024). “How a Little Iowa Newspaper’s Website Became an AI-Generated Clickbait Factory”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on February 26, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason; Cole, Samantha; Maiberg, Emanuel; Cox, Joseph (January 26, 2024). “We Need Your Email Address”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on December 2, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ “Meet the Serbian Businessman/DJ Who Runs the Zombie AI Southwest Journal – Racket”. Racket. February 16, 2024. Archived from the initial on November 13, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Lima-Strong, Cristiano (January 11, 2024). “Senators warn AI could result in ‘damage’ of regional news”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on January 11, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “OpenAI strikes $5 million-plus regional news offer”. Axios. July 18, 2023. Archived from the original on July 19, 2023. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kelly, Heather (May 22, 2024). “Meta strolled away from news. Now the company’s utilizing it for AI content”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on May 22, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “How WIRED Will Use Generative AI Tools”. Wired. Archived from the original on December 30, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Barrett, Amanda (November 15, 2018). “Standards around generative AI”. Associated Press. Archived from the original on September 23, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Viner, Katharine; Bateson, Anna (June 16, 2023). “The Guardian’s approach to generative AI”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Becker, K. B.; Simon, F. M.; Crum, C. (2023 ). “Policies in parallel? A comparative research study of journalistic AI policies in 52 worldwide news organisations”. pp. 8-9. doi:10.31235/ osf.io/ c4af9.
^ Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Robertson, Craig T.; Arguedas, Amy Ross; Nielsen, Rasmus Fleis (June 2024). “Digital News Report 2024” (PDF). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.